For General Motors, big has not proven to be better. From 50% market share to 20% and bankruptcy in just 40 years has partly been blamed on an inability of management to move with the shift from big gas guzzlers to smaller cars. The disastrous purchase of Hummer in 1999 showed how recently GM thought big still had a big future. Time has proven there were only a few big spenders like Renee Rivkin who bought these massive buckets of bolts, obviously not enough to pay the massive borrowing costs.

Less obvious to the public, and of more interest to marketers, are the views being expressed that a lack of advertising support has played a very significant role in the rapid market share loss to the Japanese car makers.

One example was the surprisingly upbeat statements by the head of marketing of GM, he is excited by the prospect of having less brands to support with his marketing budget. With the jettisoning of divisions like Pontiac, he'll be left with just four brands to promote, including Chevrolette and Cadillac. This he trumpets will give him a chance to compete with the same ad budget as Toyota.

In an obituary of the once market leading General Motors, The New York Times blames management for a failure to support it's product with advertising.

Advertising works, The New York Times says so

It points out GM finance staff wrestled with product developers and marketers, thus causing GM to fall victim to a practice called launch and leave - that is, putting product on the market, then failing to support them with advertising.

As someone who has played a part in helping numerous businesses grow share by using smart, creative advertising, this is a particularly public example of the consequences of not believing in the power of marketing. If you ever have to justify to management the wisdom of investing in advertising, when so many accountants seem to view it as a discretionary cost, use this following quote from a past executive of GM who was part of the team that created the successful Pontiac GTO in the 60s and wrote the book about it Glory Days...

Image is everything in building brand equity

Nobody gave any respect to this thing called image, because it wasn't in the business plan. It was about "when is it going to earn a profit?"

As the New York Times points out, over the years the marketing skeptics at GM became practiced at the art of explaining their problems, attributing blame to everyone but themselves.